In another bout of situational ethics (so what else is new?!), we're not going to hear a peep from the Democrat leadership about this latest ruling ... or wave of rulings - as it's turning out.
What I want to know is - if, according to conventional wisdom, girls "mature" faster than boys, then why is it wrong for a male teacher to ... uh, "Love" his teenage female student (and vice versa) when it's not only "ok," but celebrated when a female teacher "Loves" her teenage male student? Isn't the teen girl "more mature" and therefore "more capable" of making a decision on whether or not she wants to drop trou with her teacher?
Yes, nothing new here... the situational ethics of the left continue to grow like wildfire.
Conservative Utah isn't off the hook, either... the ruling took place in Tooele Co, Utah.
What the...
Fornication
Under
Carnal
Knowledge?!
_______________
* 29-year old female "teacher" Cameo Patch (no word on whether that's her stripper name) will serve NO time in jail for bumping uglies with her 17-year old male student - in front of her two year old child - despite the fact that the judge on the case acknolwedged that a male teacher would have received jail time if the genders were switched! Perhaps we'll hear liberals on this one since the ruling took place in ultra-conservative Utah.
The persistent victimization of males by female teachers is beginning to make me feel disenfranchised. I'm going to have to start demanding reparations...
No comments:
Post a Comment